Digital Economy Bill aims to make it easier for public bodies to share data and collect debt

Bill focuses on removing the legal barriers stopping public bodies from exchanging information


By Rebecca Hill

07 Jul 2016

Public authorities will be handed new powers making it easier to exchange data with each other, under plans set out in the Digital Economy Bill.

The bill, published this week, has three main aims on data-sharing, including improving public service delivery, helping to detect fraud and debt owed to government, and making it easier for researchers and statisticians to access public data.

In a statement, the Cabinet Office said: “Valuable opportunities to help people are often missed because of the way in which government stores, manages and uses data. This means we are falling behind on the services we are able to provide, and wasting public money.”


DWP staff urged to save with credit unions as new payroll scheme launches
Departments urged to consider social impact of drive to cut red tape
Outgoing information watchdog highlights rise in data protection concerns


The publication of the bill follows a two-year open policymaking process and an eight-week consultation, which received 282 responses.

The government said there had been a broadly positive reaction to the proposals, particularly from local authorities and bodies that deliver front-line services. These groups said the powers would simplify the legal landscape and allow more coordinated interventions.

The bill will establish a permissive gateway for public authorities to disclose information to another public authority for a particular purpose. However, the government stressed that the move would not weaken the Data Protection Act and that data would only be shared where there was a public benefit.

Benefits cited by the government include removing the legal barriers to sharing information on troubled families between central and local government, and sharing data to automatically give people the benefits they are entitled to.

Respondents to the consultation said that they would welcome some civic registration information – for instance electronic birth information to access a digital service without having to provide paper certificates – but there was more concern around the proposed bulk information sharing.

The government is now developing a code of practice to guide the appropriate use of the data, in collaboration with the Information Commissioner’s Office and other interested bodies.

In addition, there will be sanctions of a fine and up to two years imprisonment for those that misuse the data.

The Cabinet Office said the new legislation would help develop new systems for finding and retrieving some of the estimated £24bn in uncollected public sector debt.

It should also help individuals manage their debt with the government, the Cabinet Office promised, as well as making it easier to detect fraudulent activity.

However, because people who are in debt may also be vulnerable, the government said it would create safeguards to ensure that people who have a genuine reason for falling into debt are treated fairly.

The work on both the fraud and debt gateway measures will take the form of a three-year pilot, after which the scheme will be assessed – and it could be modified or even closed down if it is not working.

Culture change

Roeland Beerten, director of policy and public affairs at the Royal Statistical Society, welcomed the bill.

“Although there has generally been good progress on the government's digital agenda, the UK has been lagging behind in how data held by public bodies can be used more effectively to enable both the public and private sector make better decisions,” he said. 

“The proposed new legislation will create much needed improvements.”

Martin Ferguson, director of policy at Socitm, the body representing for public sector IT professionals, echoed these sentiments, saying that the measures were “long overdue in breaking down the silos of data and information handling in public services”.

However, both said stressed that the proposals needed to be accompanied by a change the public sector's approach to data.

Ferguson said: “At the end of the day, it is people in government – central and local – and in associated organisations who will or will not share data and information, and it is they who will have to change if we are to realise the ambition of holistic, citizen-focused services.”

Meanwhile, Beerten noted that other countries already had more efficient ways of sharing data, saying that the legislation was just the first step in helping the UK government catch up. “

Both culture and IT infrastructures will need to adapt to help realise these efficiencies,” he said.

Share this page