Here's why the scrapping of DECC could actually be good for climate change policy

Written by Professor Sam Fankhauser on 29 July 2016 in Opinion
Opinion

Climate sceptics were jubilant when Theresa May announced the end of a dedicated climate change department. But, as Professor Sam Fankhauser of the Grantham Research Institute argues, bringing together the teams working to cut carbon with those drawing up industrial policy could be a smart move 

What does the creation of a new Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) mean for climate change policy?

The move has variously been described as the abolition of the Departments for Energy and Climate Change, or the merger of DECC with the remains of a much-diminished Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Either way, most commentators agreed that the new BEIS signalled a softening of Britain’s stance on climate change.

Climate sceptics were jubilant, sensing a second victory after the Brexit vote that most of them supported. Environmentalists were alarmed not just about climate change, but about environmental protection post-Brexit more broadly.


New Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy swallows up DECC and BIS — full details and reaction
Two perm secs for merged Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Decc picks competition heavyweight Alex Chisholm as new perm sec


It need not turn out that way. It is true, climate change has disappeared from the departmental name, and it is possible officials will be preoccupied with the issues that the name still contains – business, energy and industrial strategy.

However, the new department also creates a much better, stronger basis from which to decarbonise the UK economy. With the right political will, BEIS can become an effective platform to turn the UK into a true global leader in the low-carbon economy.

That would be an attractive prize. The global green economy is thriving and is in fact much bigger than most people think. According to FTSE Russell, a quarter of the companies in its FTSE Global Equity Index have green business lines, which between them generate annual revenues worth US $2.9 trillion.

DECC was established by Gordon Brown, who understood that energy policy and climate change policy were two sides of the same coin. So he brought the two issues under one roof.  Theresa May has now added the third crucial ingredient: industrial strategy. In Greg Clark, a thoughtful former shadow climate change secretary, she has appointed a Secretary of State who understands the links.

The UK has some catching up to do. Other countries have long seen climate policy as a chance to create new economic opportunities in areas like resource efficiency, clean transport, energy storage and renewable energy.

The UK is rightly proud of its world-leading climate change legislation. South Korea has a similar framework law to our Climate Change Act. Theirs is called the "Framework Act on Low Carbon Green Growth" and it puts industrial policy on the same footing as environmental concerns.

When China started to include carbon and energy efficiency targets in its five-year plans, they were complemented by equally ambitious growth objectives for the strategic industries related to this agenda.

Japan has positioned itself as a world leader in green innovation, with much of the action in areas of existing industrial strength. These are the sort of countries post-Brexit Britain wishes to engage with, although Europe has not gone away. 

Germany’s green growth strategy is equally effective and focused on its areas of comparative advantage.The UK has a sizeable green economy and a credible record on green innovation (including on water).  So the potential is clearly there. What has so far been lacking is more policy coherence and consistency to turn potential into reality.

The plight of carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a case in point. CCS is an essential part of the UK’s low-carbon plan, as the Committee on Climate Change has made clear.  But making a success of CCS requires the close coordination of climate, energy and industrial policy.

The technology is best demonstrated through regional clusters, where energy generators and industrial users share the expensive transportation and storage infrastructure to create economies of scale. With the new BIES, the chances of creating these clusters are all of a sudden much higher.
“Never let a serious crisis go to waste," Barack Obama’s chief of staff proclaimed in the midst of the financial turmoil that followed the collapse of Lehman Brothers (quoting, it turned out, Winston Churchill).

Britain’s decision to leave the European Union has triggered a political and perhaps economic crisis of similar proportions.  Yet, if Theresa May and Greg Clark have the tenacity, leadership and vision, it might also have opened up a game-changing opportunity for low-carbon growth.

About the author

Professor Sam Fankhauser is co-director of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and deputy director of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, both at the London School of Economics. This piece first appeared on the Institute's blog and is reproduced with kind permission

Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs

Add new comment

Comments

Anonymous (not verified)

Submitted on 2 August, 2016 - 21:14
Theresa May, what are you doing? You just abolished a department that people were jealous to work for. You abolished an aspiration, and you abolished light. I am also a climate change sceptic, but I did admire DECC.

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

Related Sponsored Articles