BIS savings plan will require thousands of job cuts, leaked document shows

Written by Matt Foster on 11 April 2016 in News
News

Internal Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) document shows scale of staff reductions being considered under BIS 2020 plans

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills is considering plans to reduce its workforce by more than 4,000, according a leaked internal document.

Ahead of November's Spending Review, BIS commissioned consultants from McKinsey to help it draw up a strategy – called "BIS 2020" – to cut costs in the department and its partner agencies.

The Treasury ultimately asked BIS to make savings of £100m to its administrative spending by 2019-20, and eyed £150m-worth of cuts to the department's programme spend. 


BIS Sheffield closure: PCS union mulls strike as perm sec Martin Donnelly defends plans
BIS Sheffield closure: local MPs condemn department's plans
Martin Donnelly interview: the BIS permanent secretary on open leadership, the Spending Review – and the future shape of his department


But the department has opted to go further still, with its Single Departmental Plan published earlier this year saying it would save £350m over the course of the parliament.

BIS briefing – seen by CSW and which appears to have been drawn up ahead of the March Budget's announcement of a further government-wide departmental efficiency review – makes clear that the £350m includes £100m of savings that go beyond the control totals agreed by the Treasury.

And it details the scale of job cuts that the department would need to make if it were to implement the full McKinsey proposals.

According to the document, BIS will need to cut 1,526 posts by 2020 under current spending projections. But the briefing shows that that the department would need to cut a further 2,577 roles under the full BIS 2020 McKinsey proposals.

The McKinsey projections would, it shows, see over 1,500 staff cut from core BIS operations – some 750 more than the department's current plans – with around 900 jobs going at the Research Councils and almost 2,000 at the Student Loans Company, which currently has 2,500 staff.

A spokesperson for BIS said the department did not comment on leaks.

But they added: "To be clear, there have been no changes to the plans already announced and discussed extensively with parliament.

“We have a responsibility to the taxpayer to ensure as much of the department’s funding as possible is focused on front line services. We have deliberately set ourselves challenging savings targets consistent with the Spending Review and we will continue to explore options in detail before making decisions.”

Shadow cabinet office minister Louise Haigh – who has been highly critical of the department's decision to close its Sheffield policy operations by 2018 – meanwhile accused business secretary Sajid Javid of seeking to make "secret cuts" which "go further than even the chancellor thought possible".

“As his dedicated civil servants are working all hours to get to grips with the steel crisis, Sajid Javid is concocting a secret plan to lay them off,” she added.

The Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union staged a rally over the weekend to oppose the decision to shut the BIS Sheffield site and move the department's policy roles to its headquarters in London.

BIS permanent secretary Martin Donnelly has defended the BIS 2020 strategy, telling MPs earlier this year that it would involve "a great simplification in how we do things", including "focusing our expertise in specific areas" and improving BIS's use of digital technology. 

About the author

Matt Foster is CSW's deputy editor. He tweets as @CSWDepEd

Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Comments

Anonymous (not verified)

Submitted on 11 April, 2016 - 20:10
As a civil servant, I should really feel sympathy for my fellow civil servant, but somehow I can't. Why? Civil service culture is corrupt. Even more corrupt than the politicians, despite what you see in the news. Maybe not corrupt in terms of not being careful with money, but corrupt at its heart, with its dark negative idealism. The civil service needs a re-vamp. Maybe cutting loads of staff will do the job of re-vamping; but admittedly I would feel differently if it were to happen to me.

Anonymous (not verified)

Submitted on 13 April, 2016 - 10:38
interesting ....... I wonder if this comment is from a London based civil servant?

Anonymous (not verified)

Submitted on 13 April, 2016 - 15:17
You claim the Civil Service is corrupt and needs a re-vamp but are you personally doing anything to change the Civil Service or taking any action to find other employment? Have you thought that perhaps at least some of the staff directly affected by the proposed closures (including myself) considered themselves a force for good in changing the culture of the Civil Service and wanted to make a positive impact? Evidently not if you believe that a blanket redundancy for all staff in the affected sites will "do the job of re-vamping", while you remain in your post in the "corrupt" Civil Service. You clearly have no idea about the diversity of the staff that would be affected by the closures, their individual beliefs or situations but have branded them as corrupt (?).

anonymous (not verified)

Submitted on 13 April, 2016 - 10:40
interesting.... I wonder if the comment below is made by a London based civil servant?

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

Bank of England chief economist to lead industrial strategy watchdog

8 October 2018

Haldane's appointment "will give the council authority and independence", business secretary...

Rail regulator makes tracks to BEIS

3 October 2018

Whittington will start as director general, energy and security at BEIS on Friday

HMRC told to clarify no-deal Brexit cost projections

21 September 2018

Parliamentary committee calls for detailed breakdown on £18bn annual-cost-to-business figure as...

Related Sponsored Articles