Departments to get new freedoms on ‘highly specialist’ appointments
Civil Service Commission eyes relaxation of competition rules if they are “unlikely to secure suitable appointees”
First Civil Service Commissioner Ian Watmore Credit: Photoshot/CSW
Departments could be just weeks away from a new era of freedom to make appointments for particularly specialised roles without needing to run a full, open recruitment process.
Revisions to the Civil Service Commission’s Recruitment Principles, envisaged as going live from the start of the new financial year, would allow ministries to sidestep open competitions when such a move was judged to be pointless within the timescale.
In a week after the Public Accounts Committee accused the Department for Exiting the European Union of lacking a credible plan for bringing in the talent it needs to make a success of Brexit, the commission argues that its proposals could help ease recruitment problems.
- Feature: meet the civil service recruitment watchdogs
- Civil service recruitment rules eased to help plug Brexit skills gaps
- Slow recruitment is costing the civil service key skills, say outgoing commissioners
The principles are published as a requirement of the Constitution Reform and Governance Act 2010, and are designed to underscore that appointments to civil service role should be made on the basis of merit and be subject to fair and open competition.
It stated that the commission is not proposing "a major revision of the recruitment principles at this point", but adds that "some adjustments would be beneficial, particularly concerning the use of the permitted exceptions to the merit requirement".
A new exception – introduced in a draft revision of the principles that is currently out to consultation – states: “Departments may appoint people with highly specialist skills that are not readily available within the civil service for up to two years where a full open competition is judged to be unlikely to secure suitable appointees within the limited timescale.”
And it cautioned: “All uses of this exception at whatever grade, require the prior agreement of the commission.”
The commission said it wanted to make the change because it recognised that while departments were already able to take innovative and creative approaches to their recruitment needs – as had been demonstrated in relation to some digital and commercial roles – more could be done.
“We do recognise that there are circumstances when recruitment on merit on the basis of fair and open competition is unlikely to bring in individuals with highly specialist skills in the numbers required within a desired timeframe,” it said.
The consultation said that the use of the exception would “not be frequent” and would require advance consent from the commission.
It acknowledged that departments have already been given leeway to make appointments related to Brexit when hirings are supported by an appropriate business case, and when the roles are not expected to last for more than three years.
But it said the new exception, named “Exception 4”, may also prove beneficial in relation to recruiting staff with specialist skills related to Brexit.
Other revisions to the Recruitment Principles set out in draft form target better helping the civil service meet short-term staffing needs, and aiding people from disadvantaged groups to get work experience.
The consultation is open until February 26.
First draft recommendation on public service leadership and capability published
Education and Skills Funding Agency pushes back small-firms target "to keep stability in the...
Geraldine Clement explains how she harnessed her own humble beginnings to push for the civil...
Ross Duncan, of HM Passport Office, says the civil service should make the most of people...
Cornerstone provide advice on effective approaches for learning management.
Everyone loves a good spreadsheet. But if you have more than a few hundred employees,...
BT takes a look at the shifting nature of cyber threats, and how organisations can detect and...
One in four workers in the UK has financial worries. In this article, Elaine Jefferys, Money...