Government says civil servants need ‘safe space’ for Brexit talks as it refuses to publish impact assessments

Written by Agnes Chambre on 31 October 2017 in News

DExEU confirms that 58 impact studies have been produced for sectors ranging from agriculture  to tourism, but refuses to publish them

The government has refused to publish key details of a set of Brexit impact assessments, claiming officials need a “safe space” to make policy as the UK negotiates its exit terms from the European Union.

The Department for Exiting the European Union responded to a Freedom of Information request from Labour MP Seema Malhotra yesterday, claiming publication of the 58 documents would undermine policy creation.

“There is a strong public interest in policy-making associated with our exit from the EU being of the highest quality and conducted in a safe space to allow for design and deliberation to be done in private,” the department said in response to the request.


“In this case, releasing the commissioning document for this exercise, which is still a live policy issue, may undermine the effective formulation or development of policies which are key to our negotiating strategy.

“Disclosure would similarly set a precedent that would inhibit free and frank discussion in the future. Without the necessary safe space for unreserved instruction in commissioning briefs, the quality of the eventual advice from the respective exercise would be diminished and would in turn lead to poorer decision making.”

David Davis’s department added it would rather release the documents in an “organised and efficient manner” than through FoI.

Yesterday, the government published a list of the sectors covered in the 58 documents in correspondence with the House of Lords EU Select Committee but refused Malhotra’s request.

These revealed that the sectors where reports about the impact of Brexit were being prepared included, fisheries and environmental services, defence, insurance and pensions, medical devices, nuclear, professional services and technology, and tourism.

Malhotra accused DExEU of wanting a “blank cheque on Brexit” by not releasing the reports.

“The government’s reference to needing to conduct Brexit policy-making in a ‘safe place to allow for design and deliberation to be done in private’ seems to be more about keeping parliament and the public in the dark.”

About the author

Agnes Chambre reports for CSW's dedicated political sister site,, where a version of this story first appeared.


Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs

Add new comment

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

Related Sponsored Articles

A radical re-think for public sector transformation
2 November 2015

With the ‘low-hanging fruit’ exhausted, the public sector must approach new government saving...

Successful partnerships: working effectively with central government
26 August 2014

TCS is keen to contribute to the topic of successful partnerships between the public and private...