Home Office has 'no overarching strategy' for police, NAO says

Written by Beckie Smith and Nicholas Mairs on 11 September 2018 in News
News

Home Office’s “light touch approach” to running the country’s police forces means it does not understand the full impact of cuts to the service, the Government’s watchdog has warned

The Home Office must urgently address a lack of a plan for policing and “significant gaps” in its understanding of demand for police services, the National Audit Office has said.

The spending watchdog has highlighted an urgent need for the Home Office to improve how it monitors and addresses demand for police services.

The department had “no overarching strategy of its own” for policing, which holds it back from ensuring funding goes where it is most needed, the NAO said. Its probe found there had been a 19% drop in police funding since 2010, which meant forces had to reduce staff numbers.


RELATED CONTENT


“The way the department chooses to distribute funding has been ineffective and detached from the changing nature of policing for too long, and it cannot be sure overall funding is being directed to the right places,” the report said.

The department must develop a strategy setting out its long-term goals for policing, including multi-year funding settlements to provide financial stability, informed by better data collection and analysis, the NAO said.

At the moment, its accountability system statement fails to clearly set out measures to determine that the policing system is working, what information it uses to monitor forces’ financial health, or how it would respond to forces’ financial or service failure.

By contrast, the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government’s statement sets out exactly how the ministry gathers information on the financial sustainability and effectiveness of local authorities, which, like police forces, are run by locally-elected bodies.

To support the strategy, the NAO urged the Home Office to improve its collection and use of data, which also compared unfavourably with MHCLG. It said the department could learn from the housing ministry, which collects and analyses data regularly to improve its understanding of local authorities’ finances.

“Understanding the scale of financial risk and where it lies is important, as intervention after a failure is likely to be more costly than preventing the failure in the first place,” the report said.

The department should identify how collecting and reviewing data could enable it to catch “emerging signs of financial stress”, the NAO recommended. This could include reviewing capital spending alongside the level of financial reserves.

The report also concluded that severe delays to the department’s planned rollout of upgraded IT services have also increased costs to police services. The majority of the funding for the upgrade is expected to come from savings generated by the introduction of the Emergency Services Network, an improved communications system, but as of June the programme was already at least 15 months behind schedule.

Elsewhere the report criticised the move to cut funding equally among forces without considering the full range of demands on police time, the efficiency of forces, levels of financial reserves and the ability of forces to raise funds locally through council tax.

Auditor general Amyas Morse said: “The financial sustainability of police forces and their ability to deliver effective services is reliant on the Home Office understanding national and local demands and allocating funds fairly.

“There are signs that forces are already experiencing financial strain and struggling to deliver effective services to the public. If the Home Office does not understand what is going on, it will not be able to direct resources to where they are needed, with the risk that the situation could get worse.”

Responding to the report, a Home Office spokesperson said: “Our decision to empower locally-accountable police and crime commissioners [PCCs] to make decisions using their local expertise does not mean that we do not understand the demands on police forces.

“In addition, the report does not recognise the strengths of PCCs and chief constables leading on day-to-day policing matters, including on financial sustainability.”

Author Display Name
Beckie Smith and Nicholas Mairs
About the author

Beckie Smith is reporter for CSW who tweets beckie__smith.

Nicholas Mairs is a news reporter for PoliticsHome, where this story first appeared. He tweets @Nicholas_Mairs

Image description
PA
Share this page
Editor's Pick
Promote as primary content
Not Promoted

Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

Related Sponsored Articles