New PCS strike ballot planned after Home Office imposes 1.5% pay deal
The union says that introducing deal while government pay guidance is under judicial review is “an insult to staff”
Mark Serwotka Photo: PA
The Public and Commercial Services union has revealed that it is planning a new national ballot on pay next year unless the government changes its policy after the Home Office imposed a 1.5% increase on staff – among the lowest levels in the public sector.
The decision means the department is in line with civil service pay guidance issued by the Treasury and Cabinet Office in June, which limits pay rises for civil servants to a range of between 1% and 1.5%. However, the guidance is currently subject to a judicial review.
PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said the imposition of the pay deal represented “an insult to staff”.
- Home Office imposes 1.5% pay increase despite ongoing judicial review over guidance
- Anger as Javid rebuffs union's plea for bespoke Home Office pay deal
- Departments warned Cabinet Office they would struggle to afford 1.5% civil service pay rise, court hears
“The arrogance of ministers knows no bounds. Despite an ongoing judicial review into how they conducted the pay remit guidance consultation, they decide to ram through an unjust pay settlement that our members have wholly rejected," he told CSW.
“The lack of respect shown to Home Office staff will not go unanswered and the union is planning for a new national ballot on pay next year if the government does not change policy on pay.”
A PCS ballot for strike action in the civil service in July recorded 85.6% in support of industrial action over pay, but fell short of the 50% turnout threshold required by legislation for strike action to be legal.
A Home Office spokesman confirmed to CSW earlier this week that the department had imposed the pay award after talks with unions. “Those negotiations have concluded and while the unions have not agreed the offer, their views have been taken into account as far as possible.
“The department has decided that it is appropriate to implement the award now to avoid unnecessary delay in paying our staff this year’s pay award.”
CSW has previously reported that the Home Office decided in July that it would work within Treasury guidance. This meant it would not put together a business case for a bespoke deal, unlike the Ministry of Justice – although this was rejected by unions – and the Department for Work and Pensions.
FDA assistant general secretary Amy Leversidge said this week that the Home Office had “shown real disregard for its staff by imposing a derisory pay offer that has been overwhelmingly rejected”.
She added: “It’s no wonder that the Home Office consistently ranks as one of the worst departments for employee engagement on the Civil Service People Survey when their concerns about pay are being so blatantly disregarded and the minister doesn’t see the benefit in listening to his staff.”
Kwarteng said vetting processes should be "much more severe" following Sabisky scandal
David Frost says the UK will not extend the transition period beyond the end of December as “at...
Passport office not told when right of abode applicants were 'known or suspected to have used...
Site in Sunningdale will be turned into homes and retirement apartments
How can local authorities and government departments ensure that civil servants are able to...
BT takes a look at the shifting nature of cyber threats, and how organisations can detect and...
Microsoft shows a few of the ways that governments can turn data into insight
With the ‘low-hanging fruit’ exhausted, the public sector must approach new government saving...