Public sector 1% pay cap "has not hit civil service recruitment quality"

Written by Richard Johnstone on 13 March 2017 in News

Review warns that continuing restraint will reduce public sector wage differential to lowest level in 20 years.

Public sector pay restraint has not yet led to a decline in the quality of recruits to the civil service, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has found, but the government must keep the impact of the policy under review.

In a report examining the impact of two-year pay freeze from 2010 and subsequent 1% limit on increases to 2019/20 on public sector recruitment, the IFS highlighted that the pay differential between the public and private sectors would fall to its lowest level for at least 20 years by the end of the decade.

Civil service pay: PCS calls for united push to end 1% cap
Treasury approves another 1% pay cap-busting award
HS2 appoints new chief executive – on lower pay than his predecessor

The review highlighted the historic pay premium in the public sector, which was often due to differences in the characteristics of public and private sector workers, fell from a high of 6% in 2010/11 to 3.6% by 2015/16.

The peak was achieved due to freezes in private sector wages during the recession, accompanied by steady growth in public sector wages during this period. Subsequent public sector pay restraint – initially through a pay freeze and then a 1% cap on increases that has been in place since 2012 – saw the gap fell back to a level similar to before the financial crisis.

The IFS report, undertaken for the Office for Manpower Economics, examined whether this decline had lowered the level of educational attainment of graduate recruits to public sector occupations.

Using education as an indirect proxy for staff quality, the IFS concluded there had so far been little change in the education attainment of those entering the civil service.

“The average educational achievement of new graduate civil servants remains around the median of all higher education leavers over time,” the think-tank stated. There has also been little change in the relative educational achievement of those entering other parts of the public sector, including teachers, the NHS and police officers.

However Luke Sibieta, an author of the report and a programme director at the IFS, highlighted that public sector pay is set to decline more rapidly relative to that in the private sector between 2015 and 2020.

This made it “hard to believe this won’t affect the willingness of highly qualified individuals to choose these occupations” and ministers must continue to monitor the impact of the 1% annual cap, he stated.

About the author

Richard Johnstone is CSW's deputy editor and tweets as @RichRJohnstone


Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs


Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.


William MoD (not verified)

Submitted on 14 March, 2017 - 11:07
Where did this "fact" come from? Can someone please publish the study that produced this? Because, the evidence I have seen is - 16 of the first batch of 18 engineering apprentices left the MOD shortly after finishing the training. We have C1 post vacant for 11 months because we cannot recruit a qualified engineering C1. "Specialists" get promoted to posts without the relevant qualifications and experience. Sounds like "post-truth" to me.

Carol Medd (not verified)

Submitted on 14 March, 2017 - 14:47
It might not have an impact on recruitment but it has on the morale of the employees already employed.

Steve Banks (not verified)

Submitted on 15 March, 2017 - 13:35
So ... if the average educational achievement of new graduate Civil Servants remains around the median and education is used as an indirect proxy for staff quality then all is well. Reminds me of Monty Python and the Holy Grail - "If she weighs the same as a duck then she's made out of wood and therefore a witch!". It may be a surprise to some but most do not enter the Civil Service as graduates; so how that small proportion's educational achivement can be used as an indirect proxy for the quality of the staff that I manage is beyond my ability to trace a causal link. Presumably looking at how long graduates stay is also not considered an indicator of whether they find the package sufficient?

GjulesG (not verified)

Submitted on 15 March, 2017 - 17:28
"Public sector pay restraint has not yet led to a decline in the quality of recruits to the civil service, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has found". While the quality of people that have been recruited may not have declined, the number of people recruited and the vacancies still outstanding are very few and so the service is suffering.

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

Related Sponsored Articles

Spotlight on Technology: Let employees voice their feedback
9 April 2014

Employers often gauge how employees feel about the company — its culture, benefits and employee...