Government bans use of phrase ‘fake news’

Written by Richard Johnstone on 23 October 2018 in News
News

DCMS response to select committee report reveals move to tackle online manipulation by creating agreed definitions of ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ 



 

Photo: Dominic Lipinski/PA

The government has taken steps to stop civil servants using the phrase 'fake news' in official documents as it is a “poorly-defined and misleading term”.

In its response to the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee’s inquiry on disinformation and 'fake news', government agreed with the conclusion reached by MPs that the term ‘fake news’ is bandied around with no clear idea of what it means, or agreed definition.

The committee recommended that the government should reject the use of the term ‘fake news’ and instead put forward an agreed definition of the words ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’. “With such a shared definition, and clear guidelines for companies, organisations, and the government to follow, there will be a shared consistency of meaning across the platforms, which can be used as the basis of regulation and enforcement,” the select committee’s report, published in July, said.


RELATED CONTENT


The government’s official response, published yesterday, accepted this recommendation.

“We agree that ‘fake news’ is a poorly-defined and misleading term that conflates a variety of false information, from genuine error through to foreign interference in democratic processes,” the response stated.

“Over the past several months during its work on this issue the government has sought to move away from ‘fake news’ and instead has sought to address ‘disinformation’ and wider online manipulation. In our work we have defined disinformation as the deliberate creation and sharing of false and/or manipulated information that is intended to deceive and mislead audiences, either for the purposes of causing harm, or for political, personal or financial gain. ‘Misinformation’ refers to the inadvertent sharing of false information.”

Elsewhere in the government’s response, DCMS revealed that the government was “currently undertaking a range of research projects to better understand the scale, scope and impact of disinformation campaigns in the UK”.

This work has also seen the department work with representatives from the tech sector to discuss potential uses of technology such as text analysis and machine learning to identify disinformation online.

“We will continue to work with industry, civil society, academic and international partners to conduct research and build a robust evidence base that informs any policy response,” the response stated.

The department also stated that government is building its own capabilities dedicated to the assessment and countering of disinformation. “For example, the Defence, Science, and Technology Laboratory is also conducting research projects into disinformation and is working with industry, academia and international partners on the subject matter,” the response stated. “UK expertise in this field is widely recognised, and the government is working closely with international partners to share our skills and experiences.”

The response also highlighted that the government had granted the Information Commissioner’s Office additional pay flexibility to ensure that the organisation is in the best position to develop and retain its staff “to safeguard the rights of individuals in relation to their data”.

“We have also recently introduced new data protection charges, which will provide an increase of over £10 million per annum to the ICO’s income. These increased funds will also enable the ICO to continue to develop the level of expertise available to it and, crucially, to recruit an additional 30% of their current headcount to support ongoing data protection work, including effective regulation of the digital and technology sector,” the DCMS response stated.

“The information commissioner has said of our actions that she is “confident that this will allow me to prepare the ICO for its critical role under the new data protection regime ensuring that the UK has a strong and expert regulator in an area recognised for its importance to the digital economy and society as a whole.”

About the author

Richard Johnstone is CSW's deputy and online editor and tweets as @CSW_DepEd

Image description
PA
Share this page
Editor's Pick
Promote as primary content
Not Promoted

Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

HMRC tells businesses to complete Brexit preparations

20 September 2019

Checklists sent to businesses as Defra announces more ports can handle imports of rare species...

Major projects report 2019: how government is transforming services

20 September 2019

All this week, CSW brings you a snapshot of progress on the Government Major Project Portfolio...

Related Sponsored Articles

A radical re-think for public sector transformation
2 November 2015

With the ‘low-hanging fruit’ exhausted, the public sector must approach new government saving...

Successful partnerships: working effectively with central government
26 August 2014

TCS is keen to contribute to the topic of successful partnerships between the public and private...