Home Office urged to scrap plan for ‘Dad's Army’ volunteer Border Force

Written by Tamsin Rutter on 3 January 2018 in News

PCS union accuses department of casualising the workforce as proposal follows years of staffing cuts

Border Force carries out immigration and customs checks at Britain's frontiers. Credit: Gareth Fuller/PA

The biggest civil service union has accused the Home Office of “risking this country’s security on the cheap” after it emerged that the department is considering a plan to deploy volunteer border guards on Britain’s coastlines.

The government said it was considering a scheme to deploy the equivalent of police special constables at the UK Border Force, which carries out immigration and customs controls for people and goods at UK airports and seaports.

But critics including PCS trade union have raised concerns about the plan, claiming that cuts to permanent staffing levels in recent years have already led to a “casualisation of the workforce”.


The proposal came to light following a parliamentary question from Labour MP Mary Glindon, who asked the Home Office about its plans to use “Border Force Specials” – volunteer staff – to carry out aviation and maritime duties on the UK’s east coast.

In response, immigration minister Brandon Lewis said that Border Force deploys permanent employees as “mobile resources” across the UK to carry out a range of border security work in the aviation and maritime sectors.

“However, Border Force is considering the use of ‘special’ volunteers to supplement the work of permanently employed staff in mobile teams and at ports,” he added. “To that end Border Force is seeking to learn from various police forces’ use of special constables.”

The Home Office has confirmed it is considering the proposal, but insisted that volunteers will not be used by Immigration Enforcement, the division responsible for enforcing immigration law.

A department spokesperson said in a statement: “Border Force is currently considering the potential benefits of a Special Volunteer Force and is in discussion with other law enforcement agencies such as local police to understand how they use volunteers in addition to their existing workforce.”

PCS has written to the head of UK Border Force to raise its opposition to the plan and called on the government to properly resource security at UK borders with permanent professional staff. 

Mark Serwotka, PCS general secretary, said that over the past year the Home Office has increased its use of agency staff and spent “a staggering £25m” with agency firms, up £5m on the previous year. He said the government was "making our borders weaker with the use of casual labour and they are risking this country's security on the cheap".

“Border Force are already using poorly trained seasonal workers at most ports and airports, not just at peak periods but throughout the year because of permanent staff cuts. The plans to use volunteer Border Force Specials is a further move towards casualisation of the workforce."

The Mail on Sunday broke the story last week and spoke to the Conservative MP for Dover, Charlie Elphicke, who also raised concerns about the plan. He said there was a need to step up security at Britain’s small ports and airfields, but added that border security is a skilled job, which takes many years of training.

“I would urge great caution before seeking to adopt a model like that used by the police, with special constables. We can’t have a Dad’s Army-type of set-up,” he told the paper.

An Institute for Government report last year highlighted the implications of Brexit to the work of Border Force, stating that if EU citizens face the same screening process as non-EU citizens that will result in around 50 million visitors a year passing through a system designed for 15 million.

In October, the Home Office announced a drive to recruit 300 new Border Force staff by September this year.

Author Display Name
Tamsin Rutter
About the author

Tamsin Rutter is senior reporter for Civil Service World and tweets as @TamsinRutter

Image description
Share this page
Editor's Pick
Promote as primary content
Not Promoted

Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs


Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.


Anon (not verified)

Submitted on 3 January, 2018 - 18:25
What on earth are PCS Union worrying about? This is an entirely sensible proposal to utilise willing & motivated volunteers who want to help protect the borders in their local communities. The proposal is to 'supplement' the regular Border Force Officers, not to replace them i.e. nobody is being put out of work with this one. As a former special constable I can see that this is a solid proposal and provided Border Force train people as well as most police forces do, then the volunteer officers will only be an asset to the 'Border Force family' I wish PCS would worry more about helping paying members throughout the civil service who have found their fundamental employment rights under attack by rogue management and have stood by and done absolutely nothing to help including when long serving civil servants have been unlawfully hounded out of their job. Sorry to say this sounds like the usual hot air and no action from PCS in my honest and sincere opinion.

Anon2 (not verified)

Submitted on 8 January, 2018 - 11:13
Why not look CS who want part time or casual work. At least build up a pool of volunteers who want a reasonable days pay to supplement their retiree income. I'd be happy to work a couple of days a week, or a week spread over a month. I can be trained to cover jobs that would release more experienced staff to do more important work. The Government keeps saying it wants to keep the over 60s in employment, this is one way to do it.

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

Related Sponsored Articles