Agentic AI ‘could boost government productivity by 20-30%’, former lead NED says

Former government lead non-executive director Michael Jary also calls for more “outsider leaders” in civil service
Michael Jary Photo: Institute for Government

By Jim Dunton

09 May 2025

The government’s former lead non-executive director has spoken of his belief that artificial intelligence systems capable of operating with limited human supervision could offer departments productivity savings of 30% or more.  

Michael Jary, who was one of the founders of OC&C Strategy Consultants and served as government lead NED from 2022-2024, made his comments about the potential of “agentic AI” at an event hosted by the Institute for Government last week.

He added that the use of such AI power could underpin a more networked, less siloed future for government.  

“We must imagine the new model of digital-era government,” he told the event. “I would guess that the application of agentic AI in government could lead to productivity improvements of at least 20% to 30%. And also make government faster, more accessible and more transparent.”

He added: “This moment also allows us to imagine new organisational models. Rather than government being siloed around departments and agencies and on separate central and local levels, it could be inherently more networked.”

Jary said that common data sets and components, linked by a network of rules and APIs, could transform fragmented services into “seamless journeys”. He said that because government services differed greatly, the imposition of “monolithic or monopolistic structures” should be resisted. However, he said common infrastructure could be shared.

Jary said such a future would require changed ways of working, with agile development teams delivering for real user needs.  

“The organisational and cultural distance between policy and design can be shortened, indeed policy is design,” he said. “It’s about testing solutions with stakeholders, learning, and getting something into production, fast. Most successful corporates already operate this way.”

Jary said India’s delivery of the Aadhaar digital ID system to serve a population of 1.4 billion with a team of just 100 people was proof of the opportunities at hand.

He said that while compliance, accountability and evaluation could be designed into systems, there would be “important debates” about what parts of the future tech infrastructure need to be in public ownership, and what is done by the private sector.

Jary said the future would require not only a smaller civil-service headcount but also a very different skillset, with designers, product managers, engineers, data scientists, and citizen-insight specialists in even more demand.

“I’m quite confident that government can win the war for talent if it articulates the opportunity,” he said. “Would a young technology graduate prefer fine-tuning ad placement at Facebook or tackling the most important societal challenges?”

Jary also spoke of the need for government to refocus itself away from departmental boundaries, with small, multi-disciplinary teams that are empowered to make decisions. He said the Starmer government’s move to organise around missions was “promising”, but warned it may get “bogged down in the silos of the organisation structure and cumbersome coordination”.  

Jary added that his time as a NED at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government had made him recognise the need to reverse the “extreme centralisation” of government in the UK. He said the growth of funding initiatives that required local authorities to bid to central government for resources was a particular concern.   

He said local government needed to be empowered to deliver, with deeper devolution to big cities particularly important.  

Jary said such devolution should be funded by “radically streamlining and simplifying central government to do what only it can do”.

Splitting cabinet secretary role ‘not enough to drive transformation’

Jary also said that transforming the civil service would need exceptional leadership, featuring a “united top team” bringing power, expertise and credibility together.  

He appeared to suggest that current thinking in government may not be ambitious enough to deliver the change required.

“I am frankly unconvinced," he said. “Part of the solution may lie in the idea, supported by both Lord Maude and Simon Case, to split the role of cabinet secretary and appoint a full-time chief executive of the civil service.  

“I agree but I think even that will be insufficient. We will need to enlist more insider/outsider leaders: people with knowledge of the system but experience of what good looks like elsewhere.”

Former Cabinet Office minister Maude’s 2023 review on civil service reform made 57 recommendations. In addition to calling for the role of cab sec to be split, with the creation of a new “head of civil service” role. Maude said that for a period of at least 10 years the HOCS should be someone from outside the civil service with substantial private sector experience.

Michael Gove’s 2021 Declaration on Government Reform contained a commitment to establish new entry routes to the civil service for professionals from outside government. The document said they should include postings “for time-limited periods to be attached to specific projects or tasks”.

Last month Tom Adeyoola, the government’s preferred candidate to become executive chair of Innovate UK, said he was a strong believer in the principle of doing a “tour of duty” in the public sector and encouraged that other entrepreneurs felt the same way.

“The sense of wanting to do a tour of duty and make impact is there among many of my era,” he told members of parliament’s Science, Innovation and Technology Committee.

“The key thing, then, is creating the environment that will enable people to feel that they can flourish and have impact when they come into an organisation, and allowing for the ability for people to come in for two years or three years, time limited, in and out the other side.”

Read the most recent articles written by Jim Dunton - Union anger as ex-cabinet minister accuses officials of being Putin-appeasers

Share this page