Spending Review: IPA develops guidance for departments on how to get project funding

Government’s project delivery chief on how departments and the Treasury are working to improve approval of major schemes ahead of 2019 review

Photo: PA

By Richard Johnstone

17 Sep 2018

The Infrastructure and Projects Authority has produced guidance for departments on how to get projects approved in the 2019 Spending Review as part of moves to improve the initiation of major schemes across government.

In an interview with Civil Service World as part of a special report examining projects across government, IPA chief executive Tony Meggs set out the role of the joint Treasury-Cabinet Office agency ahead of the Spending Review, which is set to begin following the Budget this Autumn.


Meggs, who has led government’s project management profession since 2015, says there has been significant progress in upping the profile and prestige of projects and those who deliver them across government in recent years.

However, he highlights four main areas – project initiation, performance management, portfolio size, and getting the right skills in the right places – where improvements can still be made.

At the start of projects, Meggs says, there is a risk that too much is promised on too short a timeframe. To address this, the IPA is working to provide guidance to departments to ensure they submit high quality proposals to the Treasury, as well as assisting the finance ministry to compare departmental plans against previous projects.

“To be really blunt about this, this is about promising too much at the outset, particularly on big transformation projects, which are very often extremely ambitious and where the initial timescale is set without proper project timing and review,” Meggs told CSW.

“I could give you plenty of examples of this – big projects where either at a Spending Review or after an election – early promises are made that are not based on realistic assumptions about how long things actually take. As we move into this Spending Review, we are using a lot of data about actual performance versus anticipated performance to inform decisions that are made.”

Meggs insisted that the IPA was “not just going to be Treasury dogsbodies or checkers, we’re helping departments”.

“We are not on anybody’s side here, we are on the side of getting good outcomes,” he said.

“We are having discussions with departments and we are having discussions with the Treasury to make sure that, in their review of submissions, they are paying due attention to these things.

“We are planning to issue some bits of guidance to departments laying out the sort of things they need to consider when putting projects and big programmes into the spending review, and we are also taking the opportunity to look at some of the big programmes and see whether any resetting or recalibration of objectives or outcomes is necessary.”

  • CSW’s major projects special report will this week look at the state of projects across the Government Major Projects Portfolio – across infrastructure and construction transformation and service delivery, information and communications technology and military capability. Keep an eye on civilserviceworld.com for updates this week.

Read the most recent articles written by Richard Johnstone - Building the future: Steven Boyd on making government property work for the civil service

Share this page