Labour warns glass ceiling has been "painstakingly reassembled" in wake of latest male perm sec appointment

Written by Matt Foster on 11 May 2016 in News
News

Shadow Cabinet Office minister Louise Haigh tells CSW that government must provide more info on the perm sec appointments process, as final vacant perm sec post is filled by a man

Labour has seized on the appointment of another male permanent secretary to warn that the civil service's progress on diversity in its top jobs is going into reverse.

Alex Chisholm was this week appointed as perm sec at the Department for Energy and Climate Change (Decc), meaning all vacant posts at that level have now been filled.

In the last six months, two female perm secs have stepped down – Una O'Brien at the Department of Health and HM Revenue and Customs' chief Lin Homer. 


Jane Dudman: Where are the female permanent secretaries?
Decc picks competition heavyweight Alex Chisholm as new perm sec


But, with all the appointments triggered by those exits now made, no women have made it to the top posts – in stark contrast to 2011, when the civil service achieved a 50/50 split in the number of male and female perm secs.

At the time, then-Cabinet secretary Lord O'Donnell said the civil service had become a "genuinely meritocratic" organisation. But while the latest figures show that 39.4% of the broader Senior Civil Service is made of women – up from just 17% when the SCS was established in 1996 – there are now only four women at perm sec level.

Speaking to Civil Service World, shadow cabinet office minister Louise Haigh pointed out that prime minister David Cameron has been able to personally pick perm secs from a shortlist of appointable candidates since late 2014, and called for more transparency on the decision-making process. 

“When the prime minister changed the rules on top civil service appointments we all hoped women, BAME and working class candidates would be given a fair shot," Haigh said.

"But since he has had the power to choose from a list, he has chosen nine white men and only two women."

She added: "The top brass of the civil service is now more white and more male than at any time in almost two decades and the glass ceiling which was smashed in 2011 when women achieved parity has now been painstakingly reassembled and reinforced.

“It is time the prime minister published the list he chooses from in each of his appointments so we can see for ourselves whether under his leadership, women are being overlooked and shut out.”

Under the government's "Talent Action Plan" – aimed at improving the diversity of the civil service – departments must not use all-male selection panels or shortlists for recruitment to senior posts, except in "exceptional circumstances". A spokesperson for Haigh said Labour planned to file a Freedom of Information request in an attempt to gain access to the perm sec shortlists.

Author Display Name
Matt Foster
About the author

Matt Foster is CSW's deputy editor. He tweets as @CSWDepEd

Share this page
Editor's Pick
Promote as primary content
Not Promoted

Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Comments

KK (not verified)

Submitted on 11 May, 2016 - 14:47
Another article that is actually just about gender equality rather than real diversity... The picture on real diversity is far worse, but let not such details spoil yet another way of thrusting forward the white gender equality agenda into the spotlight at the expense of the real issue across government i.e. group-think from largely the same group of people.

Thought for today (not verified)

Submitted on 11 May, 2016 - 15:19
1. If the best person for the job is a man - why is that a problem? 1.a. Likewise for a woman? 2. If a woman is promoted into a post (by merit), isn't a bit patronising to infer that she got it because she is a woman? 3. If a woman is promoted into a post over a more able male candidate - doesn't that demotivate the man and put the woman into a situation where it may be considered as - "she only got it because she's a woman!". If genuine bias exists - that is wrong, no matter which way round it is. I suggest that Labour stops trying to score childish points by picking on things like this and starts trying to help the Civil Servants, become a viable opposition party and do something to lift the pay restraint!

Cassandra (not verified)

Submitted on 12 May, 2016 - 14:04
You don't find a lot of regional accents up there either....oh, hang on....that's because we're all thick, innit?

Thought for today (not verified)

Submitted on 13 May, 2016 - 14:02
Of course you're thick Cassandra - I mean to say, you have a regional accent and, for goodness sake, you didn't go the Oxford or Cambridge to get your degree. Sorry Cassandra (couldn't resist it) and to be slightly serious - I also wonder how what the ratio of the Permanent secretaries with an Oxbridge degree to a degree from any other university or those that don't have a degree is.

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

Related Sponsored Articles