Brexit: put deal to a fresh referendum, says former head of the civil service Lord Butler

Written by Matt Foster on 22 February 2017 in News
News

Government should not be "opposed to consulting the people on the outcome of the negotiations", argues former cabinet secretary

Voters should be given a say on the British government's final Brexit deal, according to the former cabinet secretary, Lord Butler.

Butler, who was Margaret Thatcher’s principal private secretary before serving in the top civil service job from 1988 to 1998, told peers on Tuesday night that a second referendum vote was needed to establish "the up-to-date view of the British electorate" once talks with European Union member states have been concluded.

The former cabinet secretary argued that the UK government had "a duty to be sure before our departure becomes final", asking why pro-Brexit figures "who base their arguments for Brexit on the will of the people" now appeared "opposed to consulting the people on the outcome of the negotiations".


Former Treasury chief Lord Macpherson: don't leave Brexit to Whitehall's "gifted amateurs"
Sir Ivan Rogers quits as UK's Brussels ambassador as ex-Treasury chief warns of "destruction of EU expertise"
Brexit secretary’s World War II capacity comments prompt union anger


"One has to suspect that they fear that they will get a different answer, but, if so, we ought to know," he said.

The remarks came as the House of Lords continued to debate the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill, a concession granted after the government lost its Supreme Court battle to bypass parliament before triggering Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which formally kicks off two years of talks on Britain's departure.

Butler said he would give his backing to an amendment "requiring the government to consult the people again before our departure becomes final", although he acknowledged that such a tweak was unlikely to be "of much significance" because the political climate could shift drastically by the time negotiations are concluded.

 "If there is no agreement, or if the terms of any agreement are unsatisfactory, and if there is evidence that public opinion may have changed, I expect that the Labour Party will not be as co-operative as it is now, rightly, over the passage of the Bill," he said.

"We know the position of the Liberal Democrats and of the Scottish Nationalists. The government may well be defeated in the House of Commons, as well as in this house, at the end of the negotiations.

"A matter of this importance is certainly an issue of confidence. If I am right that there is the prospect of that happening, by one route or another, the government or a new one will have to return to seeking the views of the British people – and so they should."

Lord Butler's call for a second referendum comes after two other former civil service heavyweights offered their take on the Brexit bill.

Lord O'Donnell, who preceded current incumbent Sir Jeremy Heywood as cabinet secretary, called on the government to ensure that parliament was given a "genuine vote" on any preliminary deal Britain strikes with the EU's 27 remaining member states, pointing out that other nations would be given their chance to ratify an agreement.

And Lord Macpherson, the former long-serving permanent secretary of the Treasury, urged his former department to champion "multilateralism over bilateralism" amid debates over the UK's post-Brexit trading future. Both ex-civil service chiefs signalled that they too would back amendments to the government's bill.

Author Display Name
Matt Foster
Share this page
Editor's Pick
Promote as primary content
Not Promoted

Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Comments

rick aston (not verified)

Submitted on 22 February, 2017 - 12:49
Why can't people like Lord Butler just accept the will of the people as wanting to leave the EU rather than always trying to sway people to his way of thinking, it makes my blood boil when people who lose are always trying to undermine the will of the people, democracy has spoken Lord Butler why won't you listen to it ?

Common sense (not verified)

Submitted on 22 February, 2017 - 13:46
I do not recall the electorate being given a second chance after Edward Heath decided that we would enter Europe. It cannot be good for the country to be constantly not sure if we are leaving or staying. Besides the EU council has clearly shown its hostility to the mere mention of the UK wishing to withdraw. The sheer arrogance of the EU councillers and Junckter is enough reason for me to leave.

Common sense (not verified)

Submitted on 22 February, 2017 - 13:46
I do not recall the electorate being given a second chance after Edward Heath decided that we would enter Europe. It cannot be good for the country to be constantly not sure if we are leaving or staying. Besides the EU council has clearly shown its hostility to the mere mention of the UK wishing to withdraw. The sheer arrogance of the EU councillers and Junckter is enough reason for me to leave.

Andy (not verified)

Submitted on 23 February, 2017 - 14:13
Hmmmm... imagine the furore if a sitting government, upon losing a general election, decided to have a second general election on the grounds that the voters were originally 'insufficiently informed' and should have another chance to vote... and indeed a third or a fourth, until such time as the poor unfortunate, uneducated masses finally return the desired result...

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

Related Sponsored Articles

A radical re-think for public sector transformation
2 November 2015

With the ‘low-hanging fruit’ exhausted, the public sector must approach new government saving...

Successful partnerships: working effectively with central government
26 August 2014

TCS is keen to contribute to the topic of successful partnerships between the public and private...